A Year-End Market Outlook: From Abundance to Scarcity

The best time to reflect on markets is when the noise quiets down. Late December. The screens are dimmer. Liquidity thins. This is the moment I like to sit back, and ask one simple question.

What actually mattered this year?

Not the daily tape. Not the hot takes. Not the arguments on X. The real forces. The ones that compound quietly.

This year confirmed something I have believed for a long time. We are no longer living in a world of abundance. We are transitioning into a world of constraint.

Capital. Energy. Labor. Trust. Even political credibility. These are no longer infinite resources. They are scarce, contested, and increasingly weaponized.

That shift changes everything.

For over a decade, investors were conditioned to one playbook. Buy the dip. Trust central banks. Own growth at any price. Ignore balance sheets. Ignore history. Ignore geopolitics. It worked, until it didn’t.

This year, cracks turned into stress fractures.

The system is straining.

Debt levels are no longer abstract. They are political. Deficits are no longer cyclical. They are structural. Monetary policy is no longer about fine tuning. It is about buying time.‍

And time is the one thing that is no longer compounding in our favor.

Gold made this obvious.‍

Gold did not rise this year because of hype. It rose because central banks quietly changed their behavior about three years ago. When reserves can be frozen with a keystroke, trust evaporates. When trade becomes conditional, neutrality becomes valuable. Gold is not a trade. It is a response.

What struck me most was not that gold hit new highs. It was who was buying it and who wasn’t.

Western investors largely ignored it until recently. Eastern central banks have been buying for years.

That divergence matters.‍

Gold is not telling you to get rich. It is telling you something is wrong. Historically, markets dismiss that message right up until they can’t.

The same disconnect showed up in equities.

We are living in a market that prices perfection while operating in a world of friction. Supply chains are being redesigned for resilience, not efficiency. Trade is fragmenting. Energy security is back on the table. Labor is expensive. Capital is no longer free.

Yet multiples still assume a frictionless future.

That does not mean stocks collapse tomorrow. It means the margin for error is thin. Very thin.

The most important question investors need to answer right now is not what to buy. It is who are you.

Are you a trader with a plan, discipline, and humility. Or are you an investor with patience, balance sheets, and time.

Most people think they are the latter and behave like the former.

That mismatch gets exposed in volatile regimes.

We are in one.

Geopolitics is no longer background noise. It is front and center. The world is reorganizing around blocs, resources, and strategic autonomy. The dollar still matters, but it is no longer unquestioned. Energy still flows, but it increasingly carries political strings.

Control energy, control leverage. Control leverage, control outcomes.

That reality explains far more than headlines ever will.

It also explains why commodities are no longer just cyclical trades. They are strategic assets. Copper, uranium, oil, and critical metals sit at the intersection of electrification, militarization, and industrial policy.

Supply is constrained. Timelines are long. Demand is policy driven.

Those conditions rarely produce gentle price moves.

A Word of Restraint

This is not a call to hide in a bunker or swing wildly at every macro narrative. The biggest mistake investors make in transitions like this is overreacting.

Scarcity rewards discipline.

My own framework has not changed dramatically, but it has sharpened.

Outside of the speculative bets I make in ventures, I am deliberately biased toward assets with real cash flow, conservative balance sheets, and the ability to endure political and monetary interference. I want exposure to hard assets that sit outside the financial system. I want geographic diversification, not just ticker diversification.

And I want optionality.

Optionality matters more than optimization in uncertain regimes.

This is also why I remain skeptical of narratives built entirely on confidence. Systems backed by belief alone work until belief cracks. History is very clear on this point.

Gold is not faith based. Neither is energy. Neither is food.

That does not make them exciting. It makes them durable.

As we head into the new year, I am not looking for heroic returns. I am looking for resilience. Preservation of purchasing power. Asymmetric upside where it exists. And the ability to sleep at night while the world endlessly debates itself.

This is not the end of the cycle. But it feels like the end of an era.

The playbook that rewarded leverage, passivity, and blind trust is fading. The next chapter will reward judgment, patience, and respect for constraints.

That has happened before.

It will happen again.

Enjoy the holidays. Step away from the screens. Read history. Talk to people outside your bubble. And remember that the job of capital is not to impress strangers, but to serve your life, your family, and community.

I will be back in the new year.

Clear eyed. Curious. And, if my thesis holds, ready for what comes next.

‍

Merry Christmas!

‍