Is Bitcoin Really “Digital Gold”?

Every empire in history thought it would last forever. Yet not a single one did.

There’s a pattern in markets. When the old order starts to crack, people and investors look for new anchors…

Non-stop fiscal deficits, mass migration and the seemingly inevitable takeover of AI in many industries have created gaping holes in the foundations of leading economies.

Gold Is Battle-Tested, Bitcoin Isn't

For centuries, gold played that critical ‘anchor' role in times of great change. Empires rose and fell, but gold endured as a backstop. You could not print it, you could not fake it, and when wars ended, debts were often settled in bars stacked in vaults beneath Seville, Frankfurt, Rome, London or New York. Order, in a chaotic world.

Now look around. Governments are drowning in debt. Europe is holding frozen Russian assets. Nations are repositioning gold in “safe” jurisdictions like Federal Reserve vaults. In the middle of this churn, another player keeps rising and falling in the public imagination: Bitcoin.

At first, Bitcoin’s narrative was rebellion, money outside the system. Then it was peer to peer cash. Then sound money. Today the pitch is “digital gold.” The story keeps shifting because, unlike gold, Bitcoin is still fighting for its identity.

That does not make it irrelevant. It makes it more interesting. Bitcoin forced people to learn words like “fiat,” “custody,” and “sovereign risk.” It pushed institutions to grapple with digital ownership and tokenization.

‍

Gold VS Bitcoin

But let’s be honest. When central banks buy, they are not buying Bitcoin. They are hoarding gold. Poland, one of Europe’s fastest growing economies, was the world’s top buyer last year, and it parked a third of its reserves at the Federal Reserve. Possession still matters. In finance, and especially in crises, custody is strategy.

So here is the tension:

Order is gold. Boring. Ancient. Slow moving. Still a cornerstone of national balance sheets.

Chaos is Bitcoin. Fast. Volatile. Narrative shifting. Still deciding what it wants to be.

What happens when order collides with chaos? New systems emerge. Some break apart. Others endure. I own Bitcoin (the asymmetric upside is too big to ignore), but it still lacks a clear role in the world of money.

Maybe Bitcoin becomes the digital successor to gold. Maybe it remains the spark that forced us to rethink money. Either way, people crave anchors in uncertain times.

That craving is the real story. It is why gold keeps finding its way back onto balance sheets. It is why Bitcoin refuses to leave the conversation.

The world is choosing its anchors in real time. Watch who is accumulating what, where they store it, and why.

‍