The Great Repricing: Control, Debt, Productivity & Why Asset Owners Win the Next Era

I don’t think we’re heading into a normal cycle.


Not a normal recession.


Not a normal bull market.


Not a normal rotation.

We’re heading into a repricing of reality.

And most investors are still playing by rules written for a world that no longer exists.

Let me tell you what I see. Not predictions, but patterns.

Patterns in debt.


Patterns in productivity.

Patterns in demographics.


Patterns in power.


Patterns in incentives.

And incentives always win.‍

‍

The Debt Machine Cannot Stop and It Will Accelerate

Every major government is now trapped. Not politically trapped. Mathematically trapped.

When debt reaches a certain scale, you don’t pay it down. You manage it. Then you inflate it. Then you restructure it. Then you rename it.

US federal debt is now roughly 120 percent of GDP, a level historically associated with wartime finance, not peacetime expansion.

The system is now borrowing to pay interest on prior borrowing. Policy flexibility is shrinking fast.

People ask: Why do they keep spending? Because they must.

‍

The modern system runs on three pillars:

- perpetual deficits

- perpetual refinancing

- perpetual currency expansion

‍

Remove any one of those and the structure cracks.

Federal interest expense is now one of the largest line items in the US budget, and rising as debt rolls into higher refinancing rates.

Running deficits above 5 percent of GDP outside a recession used to be rare. It is now common across major economies.

So don’t expect discipline. Expect continuity of behavior.

More liquidity cycles.


More emergency programs.


More temporary facilities.


More creative monetary tools.

‍

The Productivity Race Is Now Man vs Machine

We are simultaneously entering:

- a debt supercycle climax

- a demographic slowdown


- an AI productivity explosion

‍

That combination is rare.

Aging populations normally mean slower growth.

But AI, robotics, and automation are being deployed at industrial scale, not as consumer toys but as productive labor replacements.

The largest technology firms are committing hundreds of billions of dollars in AI and data center capital spending over just a few years. This is one of the fastest infrastructure buildouts in history.

Factories without lights.


Warehouses without workers.


Logistics without drivers.


Research without junior analysts.


Code without programmers.

‍

This does two things at once:

1. It increases output capacity

2. It destabilizes wage based consumption

‍

Productivity growth, after more than a decade of stagnation, has recently begun to reaccelerate as automation and software leverage expand.

The last 70 years of economic models assumed: More workers, more wages, more consumption, more growth.

That chain is weakening.

You can have growth without workers now.

Which means you can have profits without broad prosperity.

That is bullish for capital.

Dangerous for social stability. That kind of divergence historically leads to more redistribution policy and heavier state involvement in markets.

‍

The Fertility Collapse Nobody Wants to Talk About

Demographics is the slowest macro force, and the most powerful.

Replacement fertility is about 2.1 births per woman. Most developed nations are now well below that level. The United States is around 1.6, Canada near 1.2, much of Europe near 1.4, and some countries even lower. South Korea has recently fallen below 1 birth per woman, the lowest level ever recorded for a major economy.

Birth rates are collapsing across the developed world.

Not because of one policy. Not because of one culture shift. Because of cost, uncertainty, urbanization, and economic pressure.

You don’t fix that with a tax credit. You don’t fix that with a speech. You don’t reverse a generational trend with a press conference or a new social media algorithm.

‍

Fewer young workers means:

- weaker tax base


- higher dependency ratios

- greater fiscal strain

- more reliance on productivity tech

- more need for monetary easing

‍

Again, the system’s response is pre wired. More liquidity. More asset inflation. More currency dilution.

‍

Control Is Tightening, Not Loosening

When systems get stressed, control increases. Always.

Financial surveillance increases. Capital movement restrictions increase. Regulatory reach increases.

This is structural, not partisan. Power protects itself.

Trust, meanwhile, is declining.

Institutional credibility has taken repeated hits from financial crises, policy reversals, selective enforcement, and elite class scandals that suggest uneven law enforcement. When the public believes rules apply differently depending on status, confidence erodes and capital looks for neutrality.

Capital hates uncertainty. Capital hates selective enforcement. Capital hates rule ambiguity.

So it moves toward:

- hard assets

- portable assets

- neutral assets

- scarce assets

‍

Why Asset Ownership Is No Longer Optional

Here is the uncomfortable truth...

You cannot rely on wage growth alone to outrun monetary dilution anymore.

The math does not work.

If currency units expand faster than your income, you fall behind even when you get raises.

That is why asset ownership is no longer a luxury. It is a requirement. This increases risk for everyone looking to get ahead. And not all assets are equal.

I separate assets into three buckets:

‍

1. Monetary Hedges‍

Assets that protect against currency dilution:

- precious metals

- select commodity producers

- royalty models

- real assets with pricing power‍

‍

2. Productive Infrastructure‍

Assets that benefit from productivity and automation:‍

- energy

- critical materials

- industrial inputs enabling infrastructure‍

‍

3. Adaptive Growth‍

Selective exposure to innovation, but not at any price and not with blind faith. I like companies with established moats.

Narratives do not protect you.

Cash flows do.

‍

Why Commodities Matter Again

For 15 years, capital chased digital scale and ignored physical reality.

Now physical reality is repricing.

You cannot build:

- AI infrastructure

- electrification

- defense systems

- robotics

- grid upgrades

without:

- copper

- energy


- steel inputs

- specialty metals such as silver

- industrial materials

‍

Major mineral discoveries have fallen sharply versus the 1990s and early 2000s, while average ore grades continue to decline across many major deposits.

From discovery to production, a new large mine often takes 10 to 15 years or more, which means supply cannot respond quickly to demand shocks.‍

Supply was underbuilt. Discovery spending collapsed. Permitting slowed. Capital fled.

That does not reverse overnight.

Commodity cycles turn because of shortage, not headlines.

And shortages are forming.

‍

Markets Will Not Move in Straight Lines

This will not be a smooth ride.

We will see:

- sharp corrections

- liquidity panics

- violent rotations

- narrative collapses

- sudden rallies

‍

Volatility is not a bug of the next era. It is a feature.

The investors who survive and win will not be the fastest traders.

They will be the most process driven allocators.

Cash reserves.

Position sizing.

Hard asset exposure.

Patience.

Discipline beats prediction.

‍

Optimism With Eyes Open

I am not bearish on the future.

I am bullish on:

- human innovation

- productivity acceleration

- resource necessity

- disciplined capital allocation

- real asset ownership

‍

But I am cautious on:‍

- currency stability

- debt sustainability

- consumption only growth models

- policy credibility

‍

The next era rewards builders, owners, and allocators, not spectators.

‍

My Core Thesis

I believe:

1. debt expansion continues

2. currency purchasing power declines

3. productivity technology advances

4. demographics weaken

5. volatility rises

6. hard assets outperform over full cycles

7. asset owners stay ahead

8. pure consumers fall behind

‍

This is not about fear. It is about positioning.

You do not need to panic. You need to form your own thesis. You need to allocate.

Own productive assets. Own scarce assets. Own cash flowing assets. Own things that survive policy error.

Because policy error is no longer a tail risk. It is my base case.

‍